Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension
Pulls a random set of entries from any list with one click, right in the browser.
At a glance
3.9 out of 5
Scored by Alex after real useOur verdict
Grey Cat Randomizer extracts a chosen number of random entries from a list with a single click, and it can save frequently used lists so repeat tasks go faster. Researchers, teachers or anyone doing quick random sampling get a fast, no-fuss tool for the job. Selection criteria stay fairly basic, so users wanting more precise control over how items get picked may find it limiting.
✓What it does well
✕Where it falls short
Key features
Questions about Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension
What does Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension do?
Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension pulls a chosen number of random entries from any list with a single click, right in the browser. Users can adjust the quantity and selection settings before each extraction, and the simple interface is built for quick use at any skill level.
Is Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension free?
Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension is listed with a free plan at $0, and no paid plan is listed. The vendor's site is offline, so Toolio found no current price when it checked the extension on 4 Oct 2026.
Can Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension save lists for later?
Yes. Frequently used lists can be saved, so repeat tasks do not start from scratch, and the reviewer counts this among its strengths. That suits researchers, teachers or anyone who runs quick random sampling on the same lists more than once.
Does Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension work outside Chrome?
No. Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension runs only as a Chrome extension, with no support for other browsers, and the reviewer lists this among its shortcomings. Anyone working in a different browser would need to switch to Chrome to use it.
What are the limits of Grey Cat Randomizer Chrome Extension?
Its selection criteria stay basic, which limits control for more specific data needs, and there is no advanced filtering, so irrelevant entries can still turn up in results. Toolio says it is not for anyone wanting fine control over selection criteria, though Alex still scored it 3.9 out of 5 after real use.